Fabrizio Moro and Ermal Meta, accused of Plagiarism, I've done Nothing similar to the Song Silence (VIDEO)
The first bomb of this year's edition of the Sanremo Festival has been launched and it is something sensational: in fact, it seems that the song of Fabrizio Moro and Ermal Meta, I've done nothing, is virtually identical, at least in part of the refrain to another song that had participated in the selections of Sanremo, in the part of the new proposals. If there has been even After the Festival in the episode airing on 6 February 2018. Probably few were in front of the tv to follow After the Festival but we show the video during which the journalist, with his mobile phone is a listen to the song to Silence and embarrass even Edoardo Leo that does not know what to say. In fact, in the study it reduces the frost because the song Silence is really identical, in the refrain to the song of the Moor and the Goal. In these minutes you speak, on all the newspapers of a possible elimination for the two singers and their song. It would be really sensational if in the festival of songs, in which Claudio Baglioni has spoken for the whole time of the importance of the song, words and music, even the ones that are favorites, were deleted for plagiarism.ERMAL META AND FABRIZIO MORO ACCUSED OF PLAGIARISM AT THE FESTIVAL OF SANREMO 2018: THE SONG SIMILAR TO THE SONG SILENCE
We go for degrees starting to show you the video in which the journalist makes his report After the Festival
This is the song of brown, and Ermal Meta, plagiarism would be part of the chorus , they sing “I've done nothing” as the refrain of the main
And here's the video of the song Silence of Ambra Calvani and Gabriele de Pascali, you will listen to the two sequences, close-ups, in order to realize the similarity evident in the two songs. Amber and Gabriel sing “don't you got nothing”...
To you the judgment after listening to the two songs. For the moment there are no official communications but this news may also affect the progress of the race given that the public at home but, above all, the journalists could review their reviews.